Thursday, August 31, 2006

493. A quack*, then?

I've been unplugged since I moved in April. I've debated whether or not to get cable, and ultimately decided against it for reasons I might explain at a later date.

When I watched this video--in which Keith Olbermann compares our government to not that of Nazi Germany's, but to Neville Chamberlain's government--I remembered how much I enjoyed and miss Countdown, and not just because I think Olbermann is hot.

If you don't feel like watching the video, here is a link to Mr. Olbermann's blog. His commentary is written out there.


[Video deleted because it was making a mess of my blog. Stupid video.]

.......
My answer to Keith Olbermann's opening line in the video and segment linked above:

"The man who sees absolutes, where all other men see nuances and shades of meaning, is either a prophet, or a quack.

Donald H. Rumsfeld is not a prophet."

No comments: